Prev: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces? Next: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?

Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?

From: emu2020@c...
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 22:44:08 +0000
Subject: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lI
would build that monster as a naval vessel.

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: Adrian1 <al.ll@tiscali.co.uk> 

> Oerjan Ariander wrote: 
> > Eli: *Light* hovercraft are less likely to trigger pressure mines
than 
> > other types of ground vehicles are, but they are just as vulnerable
to 
> > mines with tilt-rod, magnetic etc fuses. However, if you put armour
on a 
> > hovercraft its ground pressure rises quite rapidly, so by the time
you've 
> > put MBT-level armour on it it'll be about as likely to trigger a
pressure 
> > mine as a light APC is. (And it won't be able to move over water or
other 
> > soft surfaces either - a heavy hovercraft will sink...) 
> > 
> > 
> 
> Where doe the Russian Zubr come in? 
> 
> What would a DS2 Zubr look like? 
> 
> While it acts in many ways like a hovercraft, is it ship? 
> 
> Could I PLEASE have one as a land GEV O:-) 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Gzg-l mailing list 
> Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu 
> http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l 

Prev: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces? Next: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?