Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?
From: emu2020@c...
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 22:44:08 +0000
Subject: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lI
would build that monster as a naval vessel.
-------------- Original message --------------
From: Adrian1 <al.ll@tiscali.co.uk>
> Oerjan Ariander wrote:
> > Eli: *Light* hovercraft are less likely to trigger pressure mines
than
> > other types of ground vehicles are, but they are just as vulnerable
to
> > mines with tilt-rod, magnetic etc fuses. However, if you put armour
on a
> > hovercraft its ground pressure rises quite rapidly, so by the time
you've
> > put MBT-level armour on it it'll be about as likely to trigger a
pressure
> > mine as a light APC is. (And it won't be able to move over water or
other
> > soft surfaces either - a heavy hovercraft will sink...)
> >
> >
>
> Where doe the Russian Zubr come in?
>
> What would a DS2 Zubr look like?
>
> While it acts in many ways like a hovercraft, is it ship?
>
> Could I PLEASE have one as a land GEV O:-)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
> http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l