Prev: Re: [GZG] DS3? Artillery [TOBECLASSIFIED] [SEC=PERSONAL] Next: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?

Re: [GZG] What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?

From: "Allan Goodall" <agoodall@h...>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:51:02 -0500
Subject: Re: [GZG] What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?

On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Ryan Gill <rmgill@mindspring.com>
wrote:

> Ram Tanks (a Canadian Sherman, more or less) had
> their turrets removed and retained the front hull
> MG, and some modifications (like an armoured air
> intake peculiar to the Ram Kangaroos).

I wonder if my e-mail didn't go through. I mentioned them yesterday in
an e-mail, but I haven't seen it appear yet and I didn't see any
comments on it.

(The first Canadian Kangaroo was based on a Priest chassis.)

-- 
Allan Goodall http://www.hyperbear.com
agoodall@hyperbear.com
awgoodall@gmail.com

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


Prev: Re: [GZG] DS3? Artillery [TOBECLASSIFIED] [SEC=PERSONAL] Next: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?