Prev: [GZG] Re: Gzg-l Digest, Vol 7, Issue 23 Next: [ahem] Wormhole Campaign Rules Re: [GZG] Re: Gzg-l Digest, Vol 7, Issue 23

Re: [GZG] Re: Gzg-l Digest, Vol 7, Issue 23

From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:22:23 -0600
Subject: Re: [GZG] Re: Gzg-l Digest, Vol 7, Issue 23

***
Wouldn't "unexplored", "undiscovered", etc. be better
than "closed"? Closed sounds like a wormhole that has
collapsed or is no longer accessible as opposed to one
that has yet to be found.
***

I think this is using Starfire terminology. Wormholes that can be
detectable from only one end are 'closed', if memory serves me right.

The_Beast

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: [GZG] Re: Gzg-l Digest, Vol 7, Issue 23 Next: [ahem] Wormhole Campaign Rules Re: [GZG] Re: Gzg-l Digest, Vol 7, Issue 23