[GZG] re: alternate threshold methods

Oops - looks like Tom's original post (and my answer to it) should 
have gone to the test list rather than the main list - just pass 
right along, nothing to see here folks....  ;-)

Jon (GZG)

>My preference is:
>
>1) Card based
>
>Yes, I know what Roger is getting at, though cards could be 
>downloadable and printable for
>ease of replacement or duplication. If you have a 'standard deck', 
>you can also produce a
>table to simulate the same effect. But I think if you could find a 
>way to do a straight
>card flip, it'd be faster than a damage chart cross ref.
>
>2) Limited input chart lookup
>
>That's my second choice. Unfortunately, if defender chooses, you 
>never loose firecons. If
>attacker chooses, you always do. If you alternate, it just takes  a 
>turn longer at max.
>Too many 'easy to break' points in FT ship design that I wouldn't 
>think this is the way to
>go. So 3 and 4 sound unlikely.
>
[snip]

 From the responses so far, consensus seems to be leaning towards (2), 
hence my posting of a first draft for a working system earlier today. 
While I have some liking for the versatility that cards can offer, I 
feel that keeping it dice-based in probably the way to go.

Jon (GZG)

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l