Prev: Re: Fire Control lock-on musings Next: Re: Fire Control lock-on musings

Re: Fire Control lock-on musings

From: Roger Books <roger.books@g...>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 13:27:22 -0400
Subject: Re: Fire Control lock-on musings

If you can't PSB this then you aren't trying.

1. Doubling the surface area of your telescope greatly increases the 
resolution. 
(square rooot? Too long since my optics class.)
2. Human element, 2 crews on 2 FCS.

Roger Books

On 6/28/05, Oerjan Ariander <oerjan.ariander@telia.com> wrote:
> 
> Samuel Penn wrote:
> 
> > >And anyway, why should more FCS improve your odds of locking onto
the 
> same
> > >target?
> >
> >The way I see it, is that FCS represent sensors. If you have more
> >FCS, then you have bigger and better sensors.
> 
> You have *more* sensors, or more computer power, allowing you to track
a
> larger number of targets simultaneously... but why would they be
*better*
> at targetting one single target?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Oerjan
> oerjan.ariander@telia.com
> 
> "Life is like a sewer.
> What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
> -Hen3ry
> 
>


Prev: Re: Fire Control lock-on musings Next: Re: Fire Control lock-on musings