Prev: Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets Next: [OT] My personal life, was Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets

Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets

From: "Richard Kirke" <richardkirke@h...>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:41:40 +0000
Subject: Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets


>So, if you can just dialup the phaser appropriately, then why would
>you ever use it on the lower setting?
>
>John

Because "stun" offers such a consequence free environment...

Also I guess it might fall into the "sledgehammer to crack a wallnut" 
catagorie. After all if you actually want to capture that building then
you 
don't want to vapourise it.

But nevertheless a good point

Richard

Prev: Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets Next: [OT] My personal life, was Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets