RE: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets

Hi Richard,

Just throwing a little something extra in; the GMS/P is guided therefore
you would be resolving the Guidance vs ECM, something like d8 or d10 vs
d4 rather than a Firepower roll n'est pas?

Regards,
Owen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU 
> [mailto:owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU] On Behalf Of 
> Richard Kirke
> Sent: Tuesday, 25 January 2005 9:29 AM
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@mindspring.com>
> >Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> >To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> >Subject: Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets
> >Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 12:54:03 -0500
> >
> >At 6:24 PM +0100 1/24/05, Oerjan Ohlson wrote:
> >>
> >>If OTOH it was some kind of dual-purpose GMS/P which could be set to
> >>detonate at a given range, eg. a meter or two over the heads of the 
> >>in-cover targets, then your ratings would make sense.
> >
> >Milan's seemed to be a great way to take care of Argie .50 cal Crew 
> >Served
> >weapons on Wireless Ridge...
> >
> >Certainly not against a whole squad. What about making it an area 
> >effect
> >blast like a single mortar round impact?
> 
> Decrease the fire-power to a D8? I am assuming against a 
> bunker etc, then 
> you should treat the bunker as a non-moving vehicle and 
> resolve casualties 
> as per an APC etc.
> 
> Thanks for the replies, do keep them coming
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
>