RE: My own comments on Re: mixing technology force in Dirtside

Yeah, that too. :)

John K. Lerchey
Computer and Network Security Coordinator
Computing Services
Carnegie Mellon University

On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Robertson, Brendan wrote:

> They're good for targeting APC's, as the splash can take out the
dismounted
> infantry at long range (as you can't target the infantry directly).
> They're also good for taking out ZAD vehicles, as they can't shoot the
> subminitions down.
>
> Brendan
> 'Neath southern skies
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: John Atkinson [mailto:johnmatkinson@yahoo.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 1:34 PM
>> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
>> --- John K Lerchey <lerchey@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
>>> So, my breadkdown is as follows...
>>>
>>> 4 Command MICVs, 24 MBTs, 12 Tank Destroyers, 12
>>> Support (SLAM) tanks, 6
>>> Artillery (plus ammo tenders), 6 APCs (with PA
>>> units), 5 ADS, 2 ARV,
>>> 8 Recon, 4 Gunships (VTOL).
>>
>> Are the SLAM tanks that useful?  I took one look at
>> 'em in the rulebook and said "Nope."  Are they that
>> effective?  What role do you use them in?  Personally,
>> I think it's a bit light on the APC numbers, but total
>> infantry elements is adequate.  Big APCs just make me
>> nervous, that's all.
>>
>> John
>
>
> IMPORTANT: Notice to be read with this E-mail
> 1. Before opening any attachments, please check them for
> viruses and defects.
>
> 2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> information for the use of the intended recipient.
>
> 3. If you are not the intended recipient, please: contact the sender
> by return e-mail, to notify the misdirection; do not copy, print,
> re-transmit, store or act in reliance on this e-mail; and delete and
> destroy all copies of this e-mail.
>
> 4. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are
> not a statement of Australian Government policy unless otherwise
stated.
>
> 5. Any electronic address published in this message is not to be taken
as a
> conspicuous publication of that electronic address.
> The Department of Veterans' Affairs does not consent to the receipt of
> "commercial electronic messages" as that term is defined in the Spam
Act
> 2003.
>
> 6. If you do not wish to receive further emails of this type from the
> Department of Veterans' Affairs, please forward your reply to this
message
> to feedback@dva.gov.au with 'Unsubscribe' in the subject line.
>
> 7.  Finally, please do not remove this notice, so that any
> other readers are aware of these restrictions.
>
>
>
>