RE: [FT] Yet Another Fighters Suggestion
From: "Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:15:04 +1100
Subject: RE: [FT] Yet Another Fighters Suggestion
Seems like the perfect opponent to use Waveguns or PBL-1 against.
Or even *gasp* a few fighter squadrons. Fighter jocks really like
targets
that can't shoot back...
Played a tournament game a few years back (report is in the archives),
where
I had a KV battlegroup with a fighter squadron, up against a PBL Phalon
Swarm fleet; at ludicrous speed (40+) the fighters were very useful in
channelling the Phalons in front of my railguns (and even took out a
ship or
two themselves).
http://home.pacific.net.au/~southernskies/ft/conquest.htm
Brendan
'Neath Southern Skies
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laserlight [SMTP:laserlight@quixnet.net]
> > Laserlight wrote:
> >
> >> Take a nest of ash Shaulah strike boats and tell me what happens.
> >
> Lachlan Atcliffe wrote:
> > Having played against a swarm of these armed with P-torps, I can
tell
> > you that it's survivable and you can even win a good 50% of the
time.
> > That's with torps, though. Something like SMRs...ick.
>
> Yes, that was my point--I was replying to Binhan's
> "if 200 points of ships can defeat 150 points of ships most of the
time,
> the side that has 30, ten point ships will almost always defeat the
the
> fleet with 2, 150 point ships, by simply generating a temporary
> imbalance on the board (sending 10 one after one ship and twenty after
> the other)."
>
>
IMPORTANT: Notice to be read with this E-mail
1. Before opening any attachments, please check them for
viruses and defects. 2. This e-mail (including any
attachments) may contain confidential information for the
use of the intended recipient. 3. If you are not the
intended recipient, please: contact the sender by return
e-mail, to notify the misdirection; do not copy, print,
re-transmit, store or act in reliance on this e-mail; and
delete and destroy all copies of this e-mail. 4. Any views
expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are not
a statement of Australian Government policy unless otherwise stated.
5. Finally, please do not remove this notice, so that any
other readers are aware of these restrictions.