Prev: RE: (fwd) Re: [FT] F***ters [was: Operational game] Next: scenario ideas [Forwarded with concern] for discussion (but not on Abortion...)

Re: (fwd) Re: [FT] F***ters [was: Operational game]

From: Aaron Teske <mithramuse@y...>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 15:53:41 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: (fwd) Re: [FT] F***ters [was: Operational game]


Just one comment, that I think explains at least some of the
difference in viewpoint...

--- Eric Foley <stiltman@teleport.com> wrote:
> And of course, this is the main hang-up some people have 
> that I don't understand.  If your opponent is using soap-
> bubble carriers, then by definition it's a custom-design 
> game.  Which means that you're no more limited in what 
> you're allowed to throw back at them than your opponent 
> is.  So why are people not simply just throwing the 
> scatterguns together and extending the digitus imputicus 
> to the soap bubbles?

..because most of the games played by many people (though not
you & your group, I know, but it is something to always keep in
mind), even with custom-designed ships, use human tech only.  So
you don't *have* scatterguns (or MKPs) to work with.

Apart from that (and I don't have my rules books handy), I
thought that scatterguns were downgraded from the MT version in
FB2?  Not sure what version of what you're using in your game,
but I *think* it's different... so many people wouldn't be using
scatterguns even on Kra'vak.  (And lots of people don't have MT
anyway.)

Or I could be mixed up a bit (it's been a while since I played!)
but the human tech-only custom ships comment still stands.

'Til later,
			  Aaron Teske
			  Mithramuse@njaccess.com
			  aka Mithramuse@yahoo.com

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

Prev: RE: (fwd) Re: [FT] F***ters [was: Operational game] Next: scenario ideas [Forwarded with concern] for discussion (but not on Abortion...)