[OT] armor penatration - angle is important
From: "Richard Kirke" <richardkirke@h...>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 09:53:21 +0000
Subject: [OT] armor penatration - angle is important
Scott,
>Hi all,
>I am new to the list
Welcome to our wonderful (and colourful!) community.
>so if I goof up on this, have some forgiveness and don't flame out.
I really wouldn't worry about that, we are on the wholea very calm list,
with usually a very low level of flame.
>Let me know if "wrong list", "off the subject" or something else
wrong.
This doesn't tend to stop most of us... traditionally posts that are not
wholly relevant are marked [OT] in the subject headline.
>I read one of the articles about angled armor and I >believe the author
>missed the point. The angle that an >AP (armor piercing) round hits at
does
>matters
>and makes the armor effectively thicker.
<snip>
>example.
Yup you are absolutely correct,I believe that this was the consensus of
the
list after some discusion (though I may be wrong, I got borred with that
string after a bit).
Very elegant example! I like it.
Richard
_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.