Re: HIGH TECH WONDER INDIVIDUAL WEAPON

Thanks for the good review.  I was told by a friend that it's pretty 
accurate.

2B^2

>From: "Robin Paul" <Robin.Paul@tesco.net>
>Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
>To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
>Subject: Re: HIGH TECH WONDER INDIVIDUAL WEAPON
>Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 00:23:44 -0000
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Brian Bilderback <bbilderback@hotmail.com>
>To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
>Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:19 PM
>Subject: Re: HIGH TECH WONDER INDIVIDUAL WEAPON
>
>
> > DAWGIE wrote:
> >
> > >combat cameraman?
> > >
> > >a movie about  combat cameramen?
> > >
> > >this ought to be  strange	and interesting too.
> >
> > From what I've heard of the movie, it's more about the recon team
he's
> > assigned to cover.
> >
> > 2B^2
>
>It was on BBC2 years ago, and I thought it was very good. IIRC you
don't
>actually see the cameraman himself- the whole film is as seen by his 
>camera.
>FAIRLY VAGUE recollection follows.  The team start out thinking the
trip
>with the cameraman is pointless\funny\stupid etc. As the situation gets

>more
>difficult, the team start to "tell it like it is", sometimes being
filmed
>unawares.  I _think_ it was made on a tiny budget, somewhere in the
USA, so
>they're clearly not in Vietnam.  The nature of the story means there's
no
>need for a big cast or huge SFX, so those aren't really problems.
>
>Rob Paul
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: