Prev: Re: Tanks. Speaking of verdammt pet peeves! Next: Re: FT-IJN Designs?

Re: DS2 More on Cascadia: CasCav

From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 18:55:17 +0100
Subject: Re: DS2 More on Cascadia: CasCav

John Atkinson wrote:

> > For the purposes of the "only one weapon system per
> > size class" rule on DS2
> > p.11, an infantry team is indeed considered to be a
> > "weapon".
>
>That's abusing the definition of weapons.  Besides,
>I'm not a big fan of this rule in the first place.
>What then the poor Ratel, which has 3 machine guns and
>an RFAC/1 (20mm autocannon), but is most definitely
>NOT a size 4 vehicle, more like 2.5 rounded to 3.  And
>if we include the 7 passengers (2 teams) then we have
>6 weapons.  Bad South Africans, BAD!

Oh, I know. That's exactly why I wrote that "Whether or not that 
interpretation makes *sense* is another question, of course" bit :-)

Later,

Oerjan
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com

"Life is like a sewer.
  What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."


Prev: Re: Tanks. Speaking of verdammt pet peeves! Next: Re: FT-IJN Designs?