Prev: Re: [FT] Full Thrust-based fighter rules? Next: RE: Fighter Rules

Re: FT-Starfire conversions

From: Charles Taylor <charles.taylor@c...>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 19:28:37 +0100
Subject: Re: FT-Starfire conversions

In message <000201c1406a$9f5148e0$418387d9@inty>
	  "Bif Smith" <bif@bifsmith.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:

>
[snip]
>
> > >Forts-Use ship construction rules, with them having a drive of 2%
mass
> for
> > >station keeping only (not thrust).
> >
> > Why bother with engines at all?
> 
> I thought they would need some kind of station keeping drive and a
power
> plant, or do other FT`ers consider these payed for in the hull mass?

Well, I tend to think that the power requirements for a system are
included in its MASS requirement (except for Sa'Vas'Ku).
> 
[snip]

Charles

Prev: Re: [FT] Full Thrust-based fighter rules? Next: RE: Fighter Rules