Prev: [LST] Re: [FT] Should all Beams fire at fighters/ordinance? Next: 2nd CanAm

Re: [LST] Re: [FT] Should all Beams fire at fighters/ordinance?

From: Roger Books <books@m...>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:18:04 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [LST] Re: [FT] Should all Beams fire at fighters/ordinance?

On 13-Jun-01 at 15:14, devans@uneb.edu (devans@uneb.edu) wrote:
> 
> Just to clear up a bit of my confusion, Roger:
> 
> ***
> > Should it be a part of the main rule system? Definitely not. I'd
rather
> see
> > the PDS capability of class 1's dropped, first. It was a kludge,
though
> an
> > acceptable one, to begin with.
> 
> It lets small ships defend themselves from fighters.	I see it as
> a necessity.
> ***
> 
> Is the above any less comprehensible than your post repeating almost
all of
> mine? Are you commenting on the other parts by omision?
> 
> Is your answer, then, that you'd rather all beams have PDS capability?
I
> didn't say I wished it dropped, just rather than have ALL beams...

I was disagreeing with the comment "I'd rather see the PDS capability
of class 1's dropped."

Prev: [LST] Re: [FT] Should all Beams fire at fighters/ordinance? Next: 2nd CanAm