Re: [FT] Weapon/Defense Archive V1.0 complete
From: Charles Stanley Taylor <charles.taylor@c...>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 19:51:28 GMT
Subject: Re: [FT] Weapon/Defense Archive V1.0 complete
In message <004301c08d4e$f8058250$1e0aa8c0@hqmknt04enu>
"Chris DeBoe" <LASERLIGHT@QUIXNET.NET> wrote:
> I'd much, much, much rather come to consensus on what's already out
there,
> than keep throwing out new halfbaked ideas and watching them vanish.
Probably a good idea, so I'll try and reign in the couple of dozen
half-baked ideas that I _haven't_ posted yet :-)
Charles (creator of half-baked ideas :-)
>
> > Now that we have so much in one place, I was thinking of starting a
> > semi-regular (depending on how much interest discussion each
engenders)
> > "Weapon of the Week" post - basically taking one system from the
archive
> and
> > throwing it out to the list for commentary/balance/consensus, then
editing
> > the entry in the archive accordingly. What say all?
> >
> > Noam
> >
>