[SG2] SG2 Index - Update Coming!!!
From: agoodall@c...
Date: 14 Dec 2000 08:12:01 -0800
Subject: [SG2] SG2 Index - Update Coming!!!
On Wed, 13 December 2000, adrian.johnson@sympatico.ca wrote:
> and an impressive piece of work that is, too!
Thanks, Adrian.
However, I think it's too big. I'm doing one more pass at it. I'm hoping
to get
it down to 4 pages, which is about what an index should be.
I ask that everyone hold off until I get a chance to post the update...
Allan Goodall - agoodall@canada.com
__________________________________________________________
Get your FREE personalized e-mail at http://www.canada.com
From - Fri Dec 22 21:59:15 2000
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA22593;
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:31:24 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eBEGUQM00283;
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 08:30:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Thu, 14 Dec
2000 08:30:22 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBEGUL000255
for gzg-l-outgoing; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 08:30:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:QIyzhHQhY8EY5ncydyLNY8n8JUpPx4L3@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eBEGUJP00249
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 08:30:19
-0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp01.mail.onemain.com (SMTP-OUT003.ONEMAIN.COM
[63.208.208.73])
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with SMTP id
eBEGUJf31460
for <gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 08:30:19 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from nsweer@ice.net)
Received: (qmail 23916 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2000 16:30:13 -0000
Received: from maxbloom1-14.fgi.net (HELO ice.net) ([204.120.168.14])
(envelope-sender <nsweer@ice.net>)
by 10.209.20.31 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for <gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; 14 Dec 2000 16:30:13 -0000
Message-ID: <3A38F449.9030901@ice.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:24:41 -0600
From: Noel Weer <nsweer@ice.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001108
Netscape6/6.0
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: setting commentary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de0000089b
I kicked this out to the GZG-pedia list a while back, and either it
isn't working right... or I'm not :). Either way, I never got any
feedback from it. I know it isn't _quite_ what this list is for, but if
anyone could take a gander at this and send me some feedback off list,
I'd appreciate it.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: setting commentary
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 12:35:06 -0600
From: Noel Weer <nsweer@ice.net>
Reply-To: gzgpedia@csua.berkeley.edu
To: gzgpedia@csua.berkeley.edu
Greetings,
This is my first foray on the list and was wondering if anyone would
care to give me some constructive feedback on a setting that has taken
shape from a Dirtside campaign that the group I play with has put
together.
I know the dates are behind the official time line, but I figured that
was safer than trying to stay up with current events :)
http://www.ice.net/~nsweer/erect/cultor.htm
Oh, and thanks in advance.
From - Fri Dec 22 21:59:16 2000
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA24875;
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:40:19 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eBEGeWX00474;
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 08:40:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Thu, 14 Dec
2000 08:38:54 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBEGcrY00444
for gzg-l-outgoing; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 08:38:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:XCwJpgh13I9NFEXQ+6VS12z7MAylKH6J@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eBEGcpP00439
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 08:38:51
-0800 (PST)
Received: from unebmail.uneb.edu ([199.240.194.41])
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eBEGcpf31992
for <gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 08:38:51 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from devans@uneb.edu)
Subject: Re: [SG2] SG2 Index - Update Coming!!!
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.5 September 22, 2000
Message-ID: <OFC0623066.FE8C781D-ON862569B5.005B424A@uneb.edu>
From: devans@uneb.edu
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:41:14 -0600
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on UNEBMAIL/Servers/UNEBR(Release 5.0.5
|September 22, 2000) at
12/14/2000 10:41:20 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de0000089c
***
However, I think it's too big. I'm doing one more pass at it. I'm hoping
to
get it down to 4 pages, which is about what an index should be.
***
I'm still going to try to 'reverse engineer' a cheat sheet for turn
structure with page references to the book.
Maybe my lack of experience with SGII(only 4-5 games over a long damn
time)
will let me give it a beginner's requirements. Or, such a muddled mess
that
someone will be shamed into doing better.
Course, anyone holding their breath should know better than expecting
flowers at the internment ceremonies...
The_Beast
From - Fri Dec 22 21:59:16 2000
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA03670;
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 11:21:01 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eBEHH1001052;
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 09:17:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Thu, 14 Dec
2000 09:16:58 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBEHGuE01031
for gzg-l-outgoing; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 09:16:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:NOPceZMQco6Cn+8M6MHGk2FGLkhfA25M@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eBEHGtP01026
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 09:16:55
-0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp3.quixnet.net (psmtp3.array3.laserlink.net
[63.65.123.53] (may be forged))
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eBEHGsf35612
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 09:16:54 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from LASERLIGHT@QUIXNET.NET)
Received: from hqmknt04enu ([63.88.48.82])
by smtp3.quixnet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA00232
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:16:53 -0500
(EST)
Message-ID: <001101c065f1$a8a1beb0$1e0aa8c0@hqmknt04enu>
From: "Chris DeBoe" <LASERLIGHT@QUIXNET.NET>
To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
References: <3A38F449.9030901@ice.net>
Subject: Re: setting commentary
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:16:55 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de0000089d
From: "Noel Weer" <nsweer@ice.net>
> I kicked this out to the GZG-pedia list a while back, and either it
> isn't working right... or I'm not :). Either way, I never got any
> feedback from it. I know it isn't _quite_ what this list is for, but
if
> anyone could take a gander at this and send me some feedback off list,
> I'd appreciate it.
I wince every time I see "we seceded from the NAC" but this is actually
pretty reasonable. My main questions are:
--why did the Brazilian immigrants set up on a station instead of on an
unoccupied continent? I have reasons for that built into the Alarishi
Empire but we don't have any terraformable planets handy.
-- if Oporto Branco controls all the shipping in the system, why don't
they
apply pressure to resolve things in their favor? If they feel like the
direct approach, they could just drop a rock. Or they could blockade,
apply
tariffs, raise shipping fees, etc etc.
From - Fri Dec 22 21:59:16 2000
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA15128;
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:08:05 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eBEI0kj02026;
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:00:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Thu, 14 Dec
2000 10:00:44 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBEI0h502005
for gzg-l-outgoing; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:00:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:kT9uqcmvPKCJIVUhALI8vFnIUR+BG9B7@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eBEI0gP02000
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:00:42
-0800 (PST)
Received: from okura.cowell.org (IDENT:root@okura.toysmakeuspowerful.com
[12.13.79.17])
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eBEI0ff41237
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:00:41 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from andy@cowell.org)
Received: from cowell.org (IDENT:andy@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by okura.cowell.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA18217;
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:00:45 -0500
Message-Id: <200012141800.NAA18217@okura.cowell.org>
To: agoodall@canada.com
Cc: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [SG2] SG2 Index - Update Coming!!!
In-reply-to: Message from agoodall@canada.com
of "14 Dec 2000 08:12:01 PST."
<20001214161201.10217.cpmta@c008.sfo.cp.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:00:44 -0600
From: Andy Cowell <andy@cowell.org>
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de0000089e
In message <20001214161201.10217.cpmta@c008.sfo.cp.net>,
agoodall@canada.com wr
ites:
> On Wed, 13 December 2000, adrian.johnson@sympatico.ca wrote:
>
> > and an impressive piece of work that is, too!
>
> Thanks, Adrian.
>
> However, I think it's too big. I'm doing one more pass at it. I'm
hoping to g
> et it down to 4 pages, which is about what an index should be.
Sez who? I'd much prefer a thorough index over a concise one.
From - Fri Dec 22 21:59:17 2000
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA18293;
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:21:14 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eBEIHY002371;
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:17:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Thu, 14 Dec
2000 10:17:33 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBEIHWJ02350
for gzg-l-outgoing; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:17:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vex.cs.colorado.edu (vex.cs.Colorado.EDU
[128.138.241.27])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eBEIHVP02345
for <gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:17:31
-0800 (PST)
Received: by vex.cs.colorado.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) id eBEIHPG03189
for gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 11:17:25
-0700 (MST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:mexMMl6g4ucEbUdrdy3jVBy3JkuK0Lus@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eBEIGaP02332
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:16:36
-0800 (PST)
Received: from exchange01.dscc.dla.mil (exchange01.dscc.dla.mil
[131.74.160.11])
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eBEIGZf43494
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:16:36 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from Brian.Bell@dscc.dla.mil)
Received: by exchange01.dscc.dla.mil with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19)
id <W6J8N8Z7>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:16:27 -0500
Message-ID:
<9DB05BB477A8D111AF3F00805F5730100D100704@exchange01.dscc.dla.mil>
From: "Bell, Brian K (Contractor)" <Brian.Bell@dscc.dla.mil>
To: "'gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu'" <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
Subject: RE: [SG2] SG2 Index - Update Coming!!!
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:16:18 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de0000089f
Perhaps you could maintain 2 versions, a concise version and an
expansive
version?
-----
Brian Bell
bkb@beol.net
http://www.ftsr.org/sg2/
-----
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Cowell [SMTP:andy@cowell.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 1:01 PM
> To: agoodall@canada.com
> Cc: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: [SG2] SG2 Index - Update Coming!!!
>
> In message <20001214161201.10217.cpmta@c008.sfo.cp.net>,
> agoodall@canada.com wr
> ites:
> > On Wed, 13 December 2000, adrian.johnson@sympatico.ca wrote:
> >
> > > and an impressive piece of work that is, too!
> >
> > Thanks, Adrian.
> >
> > However, I think it's too big. I'm doing one more pass at it. I'm
hoping
> to g
> > et it down to 4 pages, which is about what an index should be.
>
> Sez who? I'd much prefer a thorough index over a concise one.
From - Fri Dec 22 21:59:17 2000
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA28464;
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:06:48 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eBEIw5Y03024;
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:58:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Thu, 14 Dec
2000 10:58:03 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBEIw2j03002
for gzg-l-outgoing; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:58:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:CQrZuj6bkI4FRO518ZkQPUticj8o9jb6@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eBEIw0P02996
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:58:00
-0800 (PST)
Received: from mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (mta6.snfc21.pbi.net [206.13.28.240])
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eBEIw0f49809
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:58:00 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from s_schoon@pacbell.net)
Received: from [63.202.81.117] by mta6.snfc21.pbi.net
(Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9)
with ESMTP id <0G5K009GPLRPLS@mta6.snfc21.pbi.net> for
gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:23:51 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:26:38 -0800
From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <s_schoon@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: Swiss destroyer from Brigade
In-reply-to: <001b01c065e2$c70239c0$fdee1a3f@pavilion>
X-Sender: s_schoon@postoffice.pacbell.net
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Message-id: <p04320402b65ec12e1343@[63.202.81.117]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
References:
<417DEC289A05D4118408000102362E0A34D15A@host-253.bitheads.com>
<148g3t4mn7palbidr7ve9hhbmcaj501pvv@4ax.com>
<3A388912.E087D2CC@kuju.com>
<001b01c065e2$c70239c0$fdee1a3f@pavilion>
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de000008a0
>Schoon, this looks the same as the one you mentioned some months
>ago--is it just "in production" now or should there be a different pic
>here?
Just "in production" now.
I plan to give Tony a cruiser to work with next...
Schoon
From - Fri Dec 22 21:59:17 2000
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA29864;
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:14:53 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eBEJ9RA03235;
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 11:09:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Thu, 14 Dec
2000 11:09:26 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBEJ9PY03214
for gzg-l-outgoing; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 11:09:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:YrWPbziUBfY2J9yHs02CNTJ8JI9ksbA9@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eBEJ9OP03209
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 11:09:24
-0800 (PST)
Received: from mta5.snfc21.pbi.net (mta5.snfc21.pbi.net [206.13.28.241])
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eBEJ9Nf51785
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 11:09:23 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from s_schoon@pacbell.net)
Received: from [63.202.81.117] by mta5.snfc21.pbi.net
(Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9)
with ESMTP id <0G5K004R9MXVWK@mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> for
gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:49:07 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:51:31 -0800
From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <s_schoon@pacbell.net>
Subject: [FT] New Weapon
X-Sender: s_schoon@postoffice.pacbell.net
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Message-id: <p04320403b65ec3fdbc40@[63.202.81.117]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de000008a1
As it seems to be a bit slow at the moment, I think I'll throw
something into the hornet's nest.
Phased Array (the name doesn't really matter - I made it up after the
fact)
The basic concept of the weapon is something that has an INcreasing
chance to hit with range, but DEcreasing damage. Here's what I'm
throwing into the arena:
The weapon rolls to hit just like a P-Torp, but does a certain number
of dice damage, which are scored as beam dice. (i.e. For three dice
damage, results of [2-3-6-reroll of 4] would generate 3 points of
damage on an unscreened vessel.)
Range To Hit Damage
0-6 MU 6+ 6 "beam" dice
6-12 5+ 5 dice
12-18 4+ 4 dice
18-24 3+ 3 dice
24-30 2+ 2 dice
MASS 2, POINT COST 6, fires though 1 arc only.
For the statisticians in our audience...
Range Avg. Damage
0-6 MU 0.8
6-12 1.33
12-18 1.6
18-24 1.6
24-30 1.33
I left off the 30-36 range bracket since most seem to oppose any kind
of "automatic hit" with any weapon, though it would have finished off
the bell curve at 0.8
Schoon
From - Fri Dec 22 21:59:18 2000
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA30692;
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:17:58 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eBEJI0S03482;
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 11:18:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Thu, 14 Dec
2000 11:17:59 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBEJHwL03461
for gzg-l-outgoing; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 11:17:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:2TJprROs3TmX9vhTRUTo90lWwPEKID4v@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eBEJHuP03456
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 11:17:56
-0800 (PST)
Received: from piro.coqui.net (piro.coqui.net [206.99.218.243])
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eBEJHtf52812
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 11:17:55 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from rmako@coqui.net)
Received: from rmako (ppp-196-42-28-109.coqui.net [196.42.28.109])
by piro.coqui.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA25565
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 18:19:17 GMT
Message-ID: <008d01c06602$a3507260$0501a8c0@rmako>
From: "Bob Makowsky" <rmako@coqui.net>
To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
References:
<OFEC1D1222.5CBDCBBB-ON862569B4.00164021@uneb.edu><l18g3t83fifk3m63a70d7
je6kqkkk1mimb@4ax.com> <a04330100b65dda682c6b@[24.64.219.24]>
Subject: OT Game Sheet Mounting
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:18:27 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de000008a2
All some OT assistance.
I have a game board for a game that I d/led online and used Corel Draw
to
increase in size to allow the use of micro-machines. The problem is in
printing it I have a 9 x 5 sheet game board 45 8.5 x 11 inch pages. I
want
to join them in such a way as the edges are seemless and still be able
to
carry this thing around in a reasonable container.
If you have any ideas let me know.
Thanks for the time and sorry for the disruption, you folks are the
biggest
brain trust with the possible skill set that I know of <G>
Bob Makowsky