Re: SG II: Flame vs. armor
From: Los <los@c...>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 15:55:01 -0500
Subject: Re: SG II: Flame vs. armor
Ooops unless you are saying armor in the general sense of the qword,
like tank.
Cleats Balentine wrote:
> Does anybody on-list have any working knowledge of
> flame vs. armor in modern times?
>
> I wonder if partisans with molotov cocktails have
> *any* chance of getting a mission kill on a modern
> armored vehicle.
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://im.yahoo.com