Prev: Re: Great Quote Next: Re: SG II: Flame vs. armor

Re: SG II: Flame vs. armor

From: Los <los@c...>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 15:54:01 -0500
Subject: Re: SG II: Flame vs. armor

The flame form teh MCs does nothing to the armor in itself  and never
did, it's when it leaks into the engine vents and other r whatnot that
the tank gets in trouble. The same would occur nowadays, though most
modern AFvs have some sort of fire suppression system which might stop a
seroius fire..
Los

Cleats Balentine wrote:

> Does anybody on-list have any working knowledge of
> flame vs. armor in modern times?
>
> I wonder if partisans with molotov cocktails have
> *any* chance of getting a mission kill on a modern
> armored vehicle.
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://im.yahoo.com

Prev: Re: Great Quote Next: Re: SG II: Flame vs. armor