Prev: [FT] Unified "to hit" (was: RE: "No Roll to Hit") Next: Re: [FT] Unified "to hit" (was: RE: "No Roll to Hit")

RE: Poll: HBs and Armour

From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <schoon@a...>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 11:25:00 -0800
Subject: RE: Poll: HBs and Armour

>Option 1 should read "just like P-Torps".
>I  prefer option 1.

[reasons snipped]

This is an excellent point, and the associated reasoning makes me now
more
inclined to change my bias to Option 1

Schoon
Prev: [FT] Unified "to hit" (was: RE: "No Roll to Hit") Next: Re: [FT] Unified "to hit" (was: RE: "No Roll to Hit")