Prev: Re: Binary Propellant Guns Next: RE: Tanks

Re: Tanks

From: -MWS- <mshurtleff1@u...>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 13:24:19 -0800
Subject: Re: Tanks

At 04:17 PM 2/2/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>On  2-Feb-00 at 16:08, Ryan M Gill (monty@arcadia.turner.com) wrote:
>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Thomas Barclay of the Clan Barclay wrote:
>
>> > ** Speaking of which, it would be an interesting thing to work into
DS3
>> > to have a reliability factor. Let
>> > people build older tech not because it is bigger or clunkier, but
>> > because it is proven and breaks down less.
>> > In campaign games, this could be a major consideration for a force
with
>> > a long logistics tail (like across
>> > the galaxy...).
>> 
>> Yep, if you can easily repair an IC engine on Delta Tau 4, from
locally 
>> obtained spares then you are far better off than if you need to have
a 
>> shuttle (COD flight?) deliver a fusion powerpack from the sterile
>> production  floors of New Bremen...
>
>What does Crashing On Deck have to do with anything?
>
>Roger (If you've ever seen a COD land on a carrier...)

I'm pretty sure that he meant "Cash On Delivery" - which is what COD
means
to all of us non-military types. :-)

============================================================
Mark "Hauptmann" Shurtleff
 email: hauptman@sfcmd.com
 StarFighter Command Homepage: http://www.sfcmd.com/
============================================================


Prev: Re: Binary Propellant Guns Next: RE: Tanks