Prev: RE: [SG2/DS2] Infantry Walker design rules Next: FT III

Re: DSIII, was Re: An apology for the unwashed Re: Heard at The Local GameSto...

From: JohnDHamill@a...
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 17:35:30 EST
Subject: Re: DSIII, was Re: An apology for the unwashed Re: Heard at The Local GameSto...

In a message dated 1/25/00 12:38:05 PM PST, oerjan.ohlson@telia.com
writes:

<< > If we ever get to the point of doing a DS3 (NO, don't start asking
 when it'll > be out!!!!! <grin>) we'll probably do some serious market
 research as to > whether the chits stay or go
 
 ...and go from the FT2-style vehicle design system to an FB1-style one,
 too - so there's a reason to have APCs with less armour than your
 super-heavy tanks :-)
 
 ...and look over the various weapon descriptions to take the
 development during the last decade into account ;-)
 
 ...and include at least some types of aliens in the main rulebook ;-)
 
 More modifications? <g>
  >>
And give us a wider tech variance, so high tech can actually kick butt 
against low tech, some, new weapon types might be nice, a few more
vehicle 
types maybe?  Hmmm?

John
JohnDHamill@aol.com


Prev: RE: [SG2/DS2] Infantry Walker design rules Next: FT III