RE: Request to Stop Thread - OT You want underreported news...
From: "Bell, Brian K" <Brian_Bell@d...>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 07:03:36 -0400
Subject: RE: Request to Stop Thread - OT You want underreported news...
I apologize if I offended you with my request to stop the thread. It was
not
my intention. I saw that this was quickly going to be a flame war, and
was
hoping to do some fire prevention. I appreciate your restraint on-list.
Your
restraint should be applauded.
With thanks,
-----
Brian Bell
bkb@beol.net
-----
> -----Original Message-----
> From: UsClintons@aol.com [SMTP:UsClintons@aol.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 1999 5:12 PM
> To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> Subject: Re: Request to Stop Thread - OT You want underreported
> news...
>
> In a message dated Mon, 18 Oct 1999 2:24:33 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> Aron_Clark@digidesign.com writes:
>
> > I thought we had a request to stop this thread. I do then request a
> cessation
> > to all hostilities.
>
> Hmmmm....I did. But it would seem some are not satisfied unless they
have
> an audience...thus the continued posting of comments directed at me
> PERSONALLY on-list. Sad...
>
> I agree, If some of you people still want to send your thoughts to me
feel
> free. My email is attached to this message.
>
> If people continue to post on list, I will attempt to ignore them even
> when if I consider them to be exceptionally foolish.
>
>
>
>
> On a related OT however...
>
> I would like to point out that the 'nukes in space' is a non-issue.
> Unless I am very much mistaken both the US and all of the former
Soviet
> Republics are banned from detonating nukes outside of the earth's
> atmosphere by a 60's era treaty (did anyone else ever sign on?). So,
> don't expect to see nuke-detonation-powered ships anytime soon.
>
> (if this is also a 'banned' subject just let me know)