Prev: Re: GMS Air Next: What a varied group!

RE: Attack vs. MultiRole [CLEAN STAMP]

From: "Rick Rutherford" <rick@e...>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 14:03:22 -0400
Subject: RE: Attack vs. MultiRole [CLEAN STAMP]

Yes, but you can't guarantee that ALL the ordnance works correctly.
If you have any hang-fires or slow fuses, you've just made your LZ
VERY hot...

--
Rick Rutherford
I apologize in advance for the junk appended to this message
by the mail server.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan M Gill [SMTP:monty@arcadia.turner.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 01, 1999 1:12 AM
> To:	gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> Subject:	Re: Attack vs. MultiRole
> 
> I'm still of the opinion that if the troop ship can lob ordinance on
> the target area on the way in it couldn't hurt. Not necessarily
function
> as a gunship, but suppressive fire on the way in and way out.

========================================================================
======
10/01/99 14:03:24

[INFO] -- Virus Manager:
This email message and any attachments were scanned by the WorldSecure
Server that protects Electronic Systems and it’s customers. No Viruses
were detected in this message.

========================================================================
======

Prev: Re: GMS Air Next: What a varied group!