Prev: FCT working group Next: ARRRGHHHH!!! ( Was Re: Rules for BFG/FT Conversion.)

Re: [FT] NAC Fleet Roster (unofficial, of course)

From: "John M. Atkinson" <john.m.atkinson@e...>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 00:38:03 -0500
Subject: Re: [FT] NAC Fleet Roster (unofficial, of course)

Laserlight wrote:
> 
> The Avtokrator wrote:

Oh, ha ha.  Boy, you're a funny guy.  :)

> I think if you bring along one ADFC destroyer with about 8 PDS, it'll
be
> more efficient.  When the fighters die, they're dead, and the DV's are
> useless until the next contingent of fighters arrives.  Fighters die
pretty
> quickly.  Therefore, DV's spend a lot of time being useless.	This
would
> especially be the case for a battlecruiser group--assuming you're
using them
> in a "detached raider" mode--since they would be unable to get new
fighters.
> 8 PDS will on average kill a squadron in one turn, and the BC PDS
should be
> able to account for a few more if there's a second squadron around.
> Fighters are like SLM's, i.e. best used en masse.

No, no, no.  You see we think "Hey, if this can throw our commerce
raider for a loop, it can do that to anyone's commerce raiders"  So the
next Free Ukranian corsair with more balls than brains jumps a NRE
convoy would find fighters swarming out of one of the escorts.	No, for
the commerce raiding thing, we just attached some CLEs to the BCs for a
while--they could keep up.

> Not to say that the NRE always does thing in the most effective manner
> possible, any more than any other fleet does...except mine, of course
<g>

That would be the Infidel Pagan Dogs, right?

John M. Atkinson


Prev: FCT working group Next: ARRRGHHHH!!! ( Was Re: Rules for BFG/FT Conversion.)