Prev: Re: KV Railguns vs armour pt 2/2 (full ship conversion to FTFB) Next: Re: [FT/FB] Maximum ship size

RE: [FT] RG Damage Vs. Armour

From: Steven Arrowsmith <arrowjr@u...>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 09:38:48 -0500 (EST)
Subject: RE: [FT] RG Damage Vs. Armour


Ok, Ok, sorry for the flashbacks - I will burn my SFB books, when I get
home for influenceing me..;) 

Now back to the show - We can not use Range or 'to-hit' modifiers, so
that
leaves weight, points or damage to even out the classes. But I must
point
out just last week (I think) there was a thread on Class4 Beam
batteries,
where serval people - wanted to replace them with massed Class2s'.. Or
what about the ship that carried 10+ SMLs' - No matter how good we cover
the rules, someone is going to play with massed weapons, instead of a
few
larger ones.

Steven	 

On Thu, 3 Dec 1998, Sean Bayan Schoonmaker wrote:

> >Tim, instead of incressing the mass and cost of Railguns by 2, why
not
> >used 1.3 or 1.5 times? This would take longer to even out massed
class2 vs
> >Class3's.. Just a thought..
> 
> I'll apologise for this in advance.
> 
> NO FRACTIONAL ACCOUNTING !
> 
> I feel much better now. Fractions give me bad SFB flashbacks.
> 
> 
> Schoon
> 
> 

			       Steven Arrowsmith
			  www.public.usit.net/arrowjr
			     steven@arrowsmith.net
			      dredd@quake.usit.net
________________________________________________________________________
_______

		    I Would Rather live a Lie, Thinking I Can.
			 Than know The Truth That I Can't
________________________________________________________________________
_______

Prev: Re: KV Railguns vs armour pt 2/2 (full ship conversion to FTFB) Next: Re: [FT/FB] Maximum ship size