Re: Editing GZG figs...
From: Mikko Kurki-Suonio <maxxon@s...>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 23:11:55 +0300 (EET DST)
Subject: Re: Editing GZG figs...
On Thu, 25 Jun 1998, Ground Zero Games wrote:
> This may or may not be right, but I've heard stories/rumours of GHQ
using
> some serious industrial pantographing kit to reduce over-size original
> sculptures to microscale; if true, this could explain their phenomenal
> detail.
Well, it's done for plastics anyway -- I can't see why it couldn't be
done for lead if you're willing to cover the cost.
Personally, I find CinC castings to be of similar quality -- and price
:-(
> Yes, I'd agree, they are the best stuff around (though over here
> they are very expensive compared to other microarmour ranges); it
could
> simply be that they've got the best sculptor(s) in the business,
though if
> that was the case they must be paying him a LOT to stop him being
> headhunted by other companies.... :)
Given the technical and angular nature of their subjects, I'd vote for
the pantograph -- plus very stringent quality control.
--
maxxon@swob.dna.fi (Mikko Kurki-Suonio) | A pig who doesn't
fly
+358 50 5596411 GSM +358 9 80926 78/FAX 81/Voice | is just an ordinary
pig.
Maininkitie 3C14 02320 ESPOO FINLAND | Hate me? | - Porco
Rosso
http://www.swob.dna.fi/~maxxon/ | hateme.html |