RE: Obstacles, Part 2
From: John Skelly <canjns@c...>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 10:56:56 -0400
Subject: RE: Obstacles, Part 2
I've seen, in training videos, and heard from others that you can set
and blow both sides at once. When I asked some advanced Pioneers about
doing one then the other they looked kinda strange at me ;-)
Maybe Americans are more cautious or maybe it's engineers as a whole.
Are you thinking of training doctrine for creating abatis that emphasis
safety? Safety restrictions would be a lot less in war.
For a DS battle I was thinking along the lines of this:
Abatis is set up prior to game start (charges set but not blown).
Forget safe distance the Pioneers/Engineers could be sitting in a track
or in a trench either waiting for orders to detonate or for say the last
unit to pass through before detonating. I like your roll idea. Maybe a
failure would mean the unit would have to check charges on the next turn
and then attempt to detonate again on the following turn?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jatkins6@ix.netcom.com [SMTP:jatkins6@ix.netcom.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 1998 10:39 PM
> To: FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk
> Subject: RE: Obstacles, Part 2
>
> You wrote:
> >
> >I wouldn't set it up under fire either. I was thinking more along
> the
> >lines of having it set up prior to game start. Say, as part of your
> >withdrawal/defensive plan.
>
> I'd have to say there's a bit of a problem here. You aren't supposed
> to do both sides at the same time, which means that you have to split
> it between two turns. Time to rig charges, move off to a safe
> distance, blow it, come back, rig the other side, move off to a safe
> distance, blow it, and double check. Doing it all at once can cause
> problems--say roll unit quality dice vs a 3? to do it right?
>
> >I knew what you meant by Engineers being Combat engineers. Assault
> >Pioneers are infantry trained to do combat engineer tasks. In the
> >Canadian army there is one platoon for every infantry battalion. It
> >gives the bn cmd an engineer asset to be used at his/her discretion.
>
> That's not a concept I'm familliar with, so I don't really know how
> competent they'd be. Institutional rivalry says I'm shocked they
> don't
> blow themselves to shreds. . . :P
>
> John M. Atkinson