Prev: Re: Looking for casualty figures Next: Re: Of Sensors and Needles - Some Questions and Suggestions

Re: Revision Numbers

From: Fabet@a...
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 1997 09:00:08 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Revision Numbers

In a message dated 97-11-21 14:31:58 EST, rickr@ss4.digex.net writes:

<< Okay, let's call the current version "FT00000010", and the next
version
 will be called "FT00000011", assuming 8-bit bytes will be used in the
 future. Alternatively, if you'd rather the ASCII representation be
used, 
 we could call them "FT00110010" and "FT00110011", respectively.
 
No lets use hexidecimal and version numbers (sort of like Traveller
meets
Microsquish) and can have things like FTA21.3B.11.

Faron Betchley

Prev: Re: Looking for casualty figures Next: Re: Of Sensors and Needles - Some Questions and Suggestions