Re: SG - Confidence Levels
From: Barry Cadwgan <bcadwgan@f...>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 03:17:59 -0400
Subject: Re: SG - Confidence Levels
Glover, Owen wrote:
>
> I think we've been playing Cl checks a little wrong; we do teh CL
> check
> with the highest or worst factor at the time of a given check
> requirement.
>
> Here's an example:
>
> A squad of infantry come under effective fire and take casualties, one
> of which is the leader. This is also the first time suppressed. Assume
> the squad has a MM of Medium, the factors are First time Suppressed -
1,
> Unit Takes Casualties - 1 and Leader A Casualty - 3. The CL we play
with
> is LV plus just the worst ie 3 for the leader. So should we use LV
plus
> ALL factors ie 1+1+3?
>
> Any clarifiacations would be much appreciated.
>
> Owen Glover
I've always assumed it was one confidence check for each circumstance
that applies..
--
Barry Cadwgan ( BCADWGAN@FL.NET.AU )
http://www.users.fl.net.au/~bcadwgan/homepage.htm
"The end does not justify the means.
The end is the sum of the means,
as the road travelled determines the destination."
Valijon Starbringer (Hellflower Trilogy, Eluki bes Shahar)