Prev: MZ Campaign report Next: "Inferior", was Re: Just wondering.....

Re: SG - Confidence Levels

From: Barry Cadwgan <bcadwgan@f...>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 03:17:59 -0400
Subject: Re: SG - Confidence Levels

Glover, Owen wrote:
> 
> I think we've been playing Cl checks a little wrong; we do teh CL
> check
> with the highest or worst factor at the time of a given check
> requirement.
> 
> Here's an example:
> 
> A squad of infantry come under effective fire and take casualties, one
> of which is the leader. This is also the first time suppressed. Assume
> the squad has a MM of Medium, the factors are First time Suppressed -
1,
> Unit Takes Casualties - 1 and Leader A Casualty - 3. The CL we play
with
> is LV plus just the worst ie 3 for the leader. So should we use LV
plus
> ALL factors ie 1+1+3?
> 
> Any clarifiacations would be much appreciated.
> 
> Owen Glover

I've always assumed it was one confidence check for each circumstance
that applies.. 

-- 
Barry Cadwgan ( BCADWGAN@FL.NET.AU )
http://www.users.fl.net.au/~bcadwgan/homepage.htm
"The end does not justify the means.  
 The end is the sum of the means,
 as the road travelled determines the destination." 
Valijon Starbringer (Hellflower Trilogy, Eluki bes Shahar)

Prev: MZ Campaign report Next: "Inferior", was Re: Just wondering.....