Prev: Re: FT: Damage Track Sliding Scale Suggestion Next: Re: C batteries / PDAF

Re: [OFFICIAL] new ideas!

From: "Earl R. Forsythe II" <combatwombat@c...>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 16:57:55 -0500
Subject: Re: [OFFICIAL] new ideas!

>>1) We intend to do away with the artificial distinctions between
Escorts,
>>Cruisers and Capitals, and have a single "sliding scale" of ship
designs
>Presumably this would entail a different ship record form, yes? You
would
>lose the distinct three 'shapes' you have now., to replace them with
one
>generic one. That would be MOST interesting to me. I was thinking of
doing
>a windows program to do fleet / ship design and print out complete
record
>forms of the fleets ready to play and wasn't looking forward to having
to
>work out how to print three different designs. One would speed things
up a
>lot..

Couldn't you just use the same outline and change the number of rows and
columns of damage boxes?

Ray Forsythe
combatwombat@compuserve.com

Prev: Re: FT: Damage Track Sliding Scale Suggestion Next: Re: C batteries / PDAF