RE: Micromachine Conversions
From: John Kovalic <muskrat@m...>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 18:25:59 -0500
Subject: RE: Micromachine Conversions
>On Thu, 23 Jan 1997, John Kovalic wrote:
>
>> What works best for MicroMachine conversions?
>>
>> SUPERGLUE. It's a marvel with MicroMachine. The bond is amazingly
solid.
>> Half o' my Star Trek minis are conversions, and I've done some of the
>> damndest stuff you could imagine. They'd never hold had they been
metal.
>> They work great.
>>
>> John Kovalic
>>
>>
>
>
>My question deal with un-glueing. I received a Star Trek Micromachine
box
>set where some of the nacelles were not glued on straight. Any
>suggestions on how to correct the problem without doing too much
damage?
I just pull them off, as straight as possible. The glue MicroMachines
use
DOES giveway, if you're careful about it. It's not nearly as solid a
bond
as it seems, and it's allowed me to make many Destroyers and Frigates by
pulling off Bridges and nacelles and glueing them together.
John Kovalic
**************************************************
"This must be Thursday. I never COULD get the hang of Thursdays"
- Arthur Dent
**************************************************
"Wild Life": a Web comic -
at MUSKRAT CENTRAL: http://www.msn.fullfeed.com/muskrat/
**************************************************