Re: [GZG] Points system

Not crazy, but does run up against two issues.

1) FT III playtesters have been asking for AAR's for years; I know that
people ARE trying out new systems, just damn seldom reporting results,
even
without the details your plan suggests.

2) I really think OA's analysis is THAT good, not that he doesn't beat
the
heck out of his own (mathematic) figures on the board, nor hasn't asked
for
others to do the same.

Still, anytime someone makes a balance statement, you can request they
back
it up with an AAR. ;->=

The_Beastt

Robert Mayberry wrote on 05/07/2009 07:49:45 AM:

> OK I know this sounds crazy but...
>
> Has anyone compiled a list of Full Thrust engagements and their
> outcomes? It suddenly occurs to me that we keep chasing our tails
> trying to figure out if fighters are more or less than the sum of
> their capabilities, or whatever.
>
> With a big enough data set (which yes takes a couple years to
> collect), we could just run a big logistic regression to predict
> probability of winning. All those non-linear relationships could be
> identified and factored in.
>
> Just a thought.

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l