Prev: RE: Fire Control lock-on musings Next: RE: Fire Control lock-on musings

Re: Fire Control lock-on musings

From: Samuel Penn <sam@b...>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:01:40 +0100
Subject: Re: Fire Control lock-on musings

On Tuesday 28 June 2005 17:48, laserlight@quixnet.net wrote:
> JerryC:
>  >And the firing ship just has to allocate 1 more FCS then the target
gets
>  >DRM to have 95% or more change to lock-on.
>
> Oerjan:
> >Which is one of the reasons why this is a game balance problem: it
screws
>
> those ships which can't *afford* "just 1 more FCS"
>
> And anyway, why should more FCS improve your odds of locking onto the
same
> target?

The way I see it, is that FCS represent sensors. If you have more
FCS, then you have bigger and better sensors.

-- 
Be seeing you,				  ---------------------------
Sam.					  http://www.glendale.org.uk/

Prev: RE: Fire Control lock-on musings Next: RE: Fire Control lock-on musings