RE: Fire Control lock-on musings
From: "David Rodemaker" <dar@h...>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 12:08:44 -0500
Subject: RE: Fire Control lock-on musings
> And anyway, why should more FCS improve your odds of locking onto the
same
> target?
The way I see it, is that FCS represent sensors. If you have more
FCS, then you have bigger and better sensors.
---
I guess that would make sense, if there wasn't an equally valid and much
more "canon-ish" explanation. More FCS gives greater redundancy, but not
better quality.
Throughout the various rules-sets FCS have been FCS and Sensors have
(other
than MT) been ignored - and in MT they had virtually nothing to do with
FCS.
Apples and Oranges.
David