RE: (DS): Systems per Class

given their small caliber & high rof, my house rules
treat rfacs & mdc 1-2 as apsw in close assault. But Im
talking about more than apsws. If a vehicles class
allows it a certain capacity, doesnt that already put
a reasonable limit on the amount of equipment it can
carry?
--- owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
<Brendan.Robertson@dva.gov.au> wrote:
> There are practical reasons for allowing more
SAW/PDS type weapons on the
> designs; it lets you build a Slammers combat car for
example (size 2, 3 x
> SAW is DSII and size 2, 3 x PIG in SGII).
> It also makes vehicles more effective in close
assault actions (as only
> SAW/PDS weapons can fire in DSII close assaults).
> 
> Brendan
> 'Neath Southern Skies
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John K Lerchey
[mailto:lerchey@andrew.cmu.edu]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 7:21 AM
> > 
> > Hm.  I don't see how this is a "consensus" issue,
unless my reading 
> > comprehension skills are suffering badly.  I just
re-read the vehicle 
> > design rules.  It clearly states that you may have
one 
> > *weapon system* per 
> > size point of the vehicle.	It says nothing about
limits on 
> > non-weapons 
> > other than the fact that they use capacity.
> > 
> 
> 
> IMPORTANT: Notice to be read with this E-mail 
> 1. Before opening any attachments, please check them
for 
> viruses and defects. 
> 
> 2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may
contain confidential 
> information for the use of the intended recipient. 
> 
> 3. If you are not the intended recipient, please:
contact the sender 
> by return e-mail, to notify the misdirection; do not
copy, print,
> re-transmit, store or act in reliance on this
e-mail; and delete and 
> destroy all copies of this e-mail. 
> 
> 4. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of
the sender and are 
> not a statement of Australian Government policy
unless otherwise stated. 
> 
> 5. Any electronic address published in this message
is not to be taken as a 
> conspicuous publication of that electronic address. 
> The Department of Veterans' Affairs does not consent
to the receipt of 
> "commercial electronic messages" as that term is
defined in the Spam Act
> 2003. 
> 
> 6. If you do not wish to receive further emails of
this type from the 
> Department of Veterans' Affairs, please forward your
reply to this message 
> to feedback@dva.gov.au with 'Unsubscribe' in the
subject line. 
> 
> 7.  Finally, please do not remove this notice, so
that any 
> other readers are aware of these restrictions.
> 
> 

=====
"In life, you must try and be the type of person that your dog thinks
you are."

- Anonymous

	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign!
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/yahoo/votelifeengine/