RE: (DS): Systems per Class

Well, a size-3 vehicle with a 7-barrel DFFG or 7 GMS/L starts to look a
bit
silly.

Brendan
'neath southern skies

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian B [mailto:greywanderer987@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 8:14 AM
> 
> given their small caliber & high rof, my house rules
> treat rfacs & mdc 1-2 as apsw in close assault. But Im
> talking about more than apsws. If a vehicles class
> allows it a certain capacity, doesnt that already put
> a reasonable limit on the amount of equipment it can
> carry?

IMPORTANT: Notice to be read with this E-mail 
1. Before opening any attachments, please check them for 
viruses and defects. 

2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential 
information for the use of the intended recipient. 

3. If you are not the intended recipient, please: contact the sender 
by return e-mail, to notify the misdirection; do not copy, print,
re-transmit, store or act in reliance on this e-mail; and delete and 
destroy all copies of this e-mail. 

4. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are 
not a statement of Australian Government policy unless otherwise stated. 

5. Any electronic address published in this message is not to be taken
as a 
conspicuous publication of that electronic address. 
The Department of Veterans' Affairs does not consent to the receipt of 
"commercial electronic messages" as that term is defined in the Spam Act
2003. 

6. If you do not wish to receive further emails of this type from the 
Department of Veterans' Affairs, please forward your reply to this
message 
to feedback@dva.gov.au with 'Unsubscribe' in the subject line. 

7.  Finally, please do not remove this notice, so that any 
other readers are aware of these restrictions.