Prev: Re: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops Next: Re: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops

Re: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops

From: Ryan M Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 15:07:24 -0500
Subject: Re: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops

At 2:48 PM -0500 4/4/03, Roger Books wrote:
>You are of course correct, that is unless we want to actually avoid
>a flamewar on the list.

Well, John isn't here so it shouldn't be that big...He'll be sad he 
missed it. I can imaging his response....

Damn I hope he's ok. He's going to be in quite the demand for all 
those canal and river crossings in Bagdad.
-- 
  Ryan Gill		 rmgill@SPAMmindspring.com
---------------------------------------------------------- 
      |        |		  |	     -==----	    
      | O--=-  |	|	  |	    /_8[*]°_\	     
      |_/|o|_\_|	|_________|	  __/_[===]_\	    
      / 00DA61 \	/---------\	 | /	     \---   
   _w/|=_[__]_= \w_    // [_]  o[]\\   __|O\	     /O_|_  
  |: O(4) ==	O :|  _Oo\=======/_O_  |_41_\	    /____|  
  |---\________/---|  [__41____(&)__]	|/||_\	   /_||/|   
   |/|\        /|/|   |/|/F 48582\|/|	|/|-\|	   |/-|/|   
   |/|=\______/=|/|   |/|=|_____|=|/|	|/|--|_____|--|/|   
   |/|		|/|   |/|	  |/|	|/|	      |/|   
  '60 Daimler Ferret '42 Daimler Dingo '43 Humber MkIV (1/2)
----------------------------------------------------------

Prev: Re: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops Next: Re: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops