Prev: Re: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops Next: Re: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops

Re: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops

From: Roger Books <books@j...>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 14:48:36 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops

You are of course correct, that is unless we want to actually avoid
a flamewar on the list.

Roger Books

On  4-Apr-03 at 11:49, DOCAgren@aol.com (DOCAgren@aol.com) wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 4/3/03 2:01:38 AM, 
> owner-gzg-digest@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU writes:
> 
> << Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 23:58:02 -0800 (PST)
> From: Brian Burger <yh728@victoria.tc.ca>
> Subject: Re: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops
> 
> Someone said something amusing to me about "no politics on list", and
I
> agreed to stop posting politically-slanted items.
> 
> Laserlight, I think this qualifies too.
> 
> Just a reminder,
> 
> Brian.
>  >>
> 
> And given that a # of our list members are currently/have been
deployed, I 
> see nothing wrong with it.
> 
> DOC Agren
> Lurker on Digest and Random Poster
> 

Prev: Re: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops Next: Re: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops