Evacuated Tube Transport
From: "Thomas Barclay" <kaladorn@m...>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 04:32:20 -0500
Subject: Evacuated Tube Transport
1. ETT's might be dangerous, but they are neat
looking sci-fi.
2. Aren't hyperspeed trains also a big danger in
terms of sabotage etc - as you have to secure
their tracks too? Things like the TGV etc?
3. On a vacuum moon or something, the risk of
penetration that is posed by external
atmospheric pressure goes away.
4. It has traditionally been far more efficient to
move mass by rail than by truck or plane (by a
long shot) - and this method looks even more
energy efficient. If your concern isn't the danger
to the apparatus, but the cost efficiency of the
system, this system may move KGs (and
conventional rail definitely does) far cheaper
across continental distances than your air-net.
I'm not saying this is viable any more than a
space elevator is (both are contestible points).
But both also make for some interesting
chrome for a setting (beanstalk anchor would
be an interesting target point for a DS2 or SG2
mission..... and so would a tube-train line.
---------------------------------------------
Thomas Barclay
Co-Creator of http://www.stargrunt.ca
Stargrunt II and Dirtside II game site
No Battle Plan Survives Contact With Dice.
-- Mark 'Indy' Kochte
---------------------------------------------