Prev: RE: CNP and TTN (Was Hmmm.... Was Re: OK OK I Give! (Was Powers)) Next: Re: M class Stars not planets

RE: CNP and TTN (Was Hmmm.... Was Re: OK OK I Give! (Was Powers))

From: "Brian Bilderback" <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 15:15:30 -0800
Subject: RE: CNP and TTN (Was Hmmm.... Was Re: OK OK I Give! (Was Powers))

Given.	However, my main concern is with justifying any considerable FTL

capability.  It seems unnecessary with only 1 planet.

Brian

"The Irish are the only race of people on Earth for which psychoanalysis
is 
of no use."

				 - S. Freud

>From: Beth.Fulton@csiro.au
>Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
>To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
>Subject: RE: CNP and TTN (Was Hmmm.... Was Re: OK OK I Give! (Was
Powers))
>Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 10:10:39 +1100
>
>G'day,
>
> >I'd like to have at least a couple of worlds,
> >for playability (gives me more places to stage
> >battles and therefore games).  The way the NAC helped
>them get started makes it a bit more plausible.
> >It would also cut down on inter-tribal tension,
> >since they'd be able to place tribes with
> >EXTREMELY volatile histories on different worlds.
>
>While these are all sound reasons don't forget we're talking planets
here!
>There's an AWFUL lot of room even on small ones and I'd say an awful
lot of
>habitats despite Hollywoods obcession with "its all desert/water/lush
>jungle" visions. As far as anyone can tell, anything with a working
biome
>that will support human habitation is going to end up with many
different
>environments. So even one planet will provide many locations for a
battle
>and a lot of settlement space - look how many habitats and different
>cultures there are on this planet ;)
>
>Cheers
>
>Beth

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Prev: RE: CNP and TTN (Was Hmmm.... Was Re: OK OK I Give! (Was Powers)) Next: Re: M class Stars not planets