Prev: Re: Small squads/random losses Next: Re: Small squads/random losses

Re: Small squads/random losses

From: Andy Cowell <andy@c...>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 13:53:50 -0500
Subject: Re: Small squads/random losses

In message <ML-3.4.987705120.5202.books@babinga.dms.state.fl.us>, Roger
Books w
rites:
> Unless, of course, you treat your large squad as two fire-teams
> and split off a detachment.  Then you are in the same boat. :)
> 
> There are other disadvantages to small squads, close assualt a 
> squad of 4 with a squad of 8 and see what happens.  I'm neutral
> on the arguement, it's just there is so much hostility to small
> squads that it makes me want to jump in on the other side.

Sure-- my 4 POWER ARMOR with auto-shotguns and flamers will KICK ASS.
;)

Actually, I haven't followed most of these discussions closely, but I
was under the impression the majority of the list was PRO small squad,


Prev: Re: Small squads/random losses Next: Re: Small squads/random losses