Re: GMS vs Infantry
From: Aaron Teske <ateske@H...>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2000 21:37:47 -0500
Subject: Re: GMS vs Infantry
At 05:48 PM 3/4/00 -0500, you wrote:
>(Snip: Scott asking Los about his qualifications to talk about
>combat)
>
>>> This is funny....
>
>It was, indeed.
No offense to Scott, but yeah, it was....
>Scott, on this list, you generally have to start by assuming
>people who are doing the talking probably know quite a bit about
>what they're talking about. We recognize this is unusual--and I
>say that in all seriousness. We have at least one military
>programmer, a weapons designer, several professional soldiers, a
>one naval officer (temporarily off list at the moment), a number
>of astronomers and people in related fields, a pathologist (I
>think--still here?), a biologist or two, plus--since we're doing
>introductions--St^3 Jon (Tuffley), Aaron "Teske Field" Teske,
>whose dice always roll high;
Wow. I rate an introduction? Or is that just 'cause of the Teske
Field?
(Which I seem to lend out at inopportune moments....)
>Indy "Inverse Teske Field" Kochte,
>whose dice--at least for p-torps--have five 1's and a 2;
A.k.a. the Kochte effect, or just "@#$^!!".
>and
>myself, who am not especially expert at anything but I'm always
>willing to chime in anyway.....
Lotsa dem, usually including me. ^_^
>Welcome to the list!
Aye-yup!
Aaron Teske
ateske@HICom.net