Prev: Re: Scenario idea - new Next: Scenarios, previous and future

RE: FT/FB Clarifications

From: "Bell, Brian K" <Brian_Bell@d...>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 13:49:05 -0500
Subject: RE: FT/FB Clarifications

Yes. It works well. You need to double the movement points as I
and have to "pay" for turns for it to work well. It restores the more
maneuverable small ship concept of FT that was lost with the Fleetbook

As Jaime mentioned, you do have to change Fighter and Missile movement
used 36" for Fighters and Salvo Missiles. And 60" for Fast Fighters, MT
ER Salvo Missiles). We also increased the range of Wave Guns to 54"
and Nova Cannons to 72" (3x24) but kept the width of the blast the same.

Brian Bell	   

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Sarno []
> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2000 1:26 PM
> To:	gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> Subject:	Re: FT/FB Clarifications
> "Bell, Brian K" wrote:
> > 4. I would allow multiple rotations (turn, fire MD, turn) as long as
> > ship had the movement points to accomplish it.
> Brian,
>	  I like all of your ideas to re-write vector movement.  Have
> done any
> paytesting with the turn, thrust, turn variant you mentioned?
> -Mike
> --
> Michael Sarno
> Check out the Charlie Company Discussion Group:
> Info, resources, and links for RAFM's miniatures
> skirmish wargame of infantry combat in Vietnam 1965-1972
> "Tradition refuses to submit to the small and
>  arrogant oligarchy of those who merely happen
>  to be walking about."
>  -G.K. Chesterton

Prev: Re: Scenario idea - new Next: Scenarios, previous and future