Re: Way OT :o) S & C Tech levels compared.
From: "Geoffery R" <geofferyr@h...>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 1999 06:44:35 PST
Subject: Re: Way OT :o) S & C Tech levels compared.
"The airwar over Germany in WWII is very interesting. Each side
continually developed tactical and equipment counters, counter counters,
counter counter counter, etc. Do not assume that future opposition will
be
as incompetent as the Iraqi's or as outnumbered as the Serb's. By the
way,
how many months did it take build up the assets in Iraq to crush them so
easily? 4 to 5 months, if I remember correctly."
Because of the weakness of the USSR at the time NATO (Read the USA with
a
few hangers on) was able to transport and use basicly anything it wanted
without worrying about secondard theatre's. So some the most
sophisticated
and expensive equipment in the world designed to fight the Armoured
Juggarnaut of a nuclear armed Superpower, was moved under near ideal
conditions then prepared for use against a small country with a mainly
conscript military surrounded by enemys and with lots of lovely flat
open
terrain that it is very hard to hide, especially resup units which HAVE
to
move.
Just think of it in the terms of one of those FT futuristic fleets
turning
up over North America and Orillerying it until not a powerstation,
comunications center, military base or missle silo was left standing.
Then
thinking about landing ground forces thats about what happened in both
cases.
Buck
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com