Re: balancing Fighters and different SM loads

Tom Anderson wrote:
> yes, you did say that: your rules seem clear and consistent. however,
i
> would object that they differentiate between ships and fighters: if
> everything in the blast area takes at least 1 point of damage,
shouldn't
> fighters be destroyed instantly, a la nova cannon? i can't see why
> fighters would be immune to the blast (although you can prove anything
> with PSB). note that this would make the SM-B a very effective
> anti-fighter weapon, which is not what it was intended for.

Oh damn.  Grrrr.  I didn't think of that.  

I guess, in the spirit of the weapon, an exploding blast wave would
tend to wipe out small stuff in its path.  (8-)

Back to the drawing board...

J.

-- 
/ Jerry Han -  CANOE Canada - jhan@canoe.ca -
http://people.canoe.ca/jhan \
  ** Visit the Canadian Online Explorer! => http://www.canoe.ca **
TBFTGOGGI
 The opinions expressed are mine, and not necessarily those of CANOE
Canada.
	 "...And if I should try, Would you catch me If I Fall?"