Re: Continuum? RE: [FT] Quiet in here, isn't it.

In message <BLUPR05MB197031952B70C7FC94972D1CA83F0@BLUPR05MB1970.nampr 
d05.prod.outlook.com>
	  Douglas Evans <devans@nebraska.edu> wrote:

> Which brings up questions I was just thinking of asking...

> How many of the 'old crew' have tried new versions? How many like?

> Personally, I find the Continuum's 'sideslip' worded so loosely, along
> with the examples, as to nullify the movement structure altogether,
> but the young turks are correct in labeling me a 'curmudgeon'. I HAVE
> used it as signature whenever I bother.

How does it compare with the wording in the WDA?

On that subject, I recently had a look at the old WDA, I last updated 
it back in 2003!

Relatedly, is there a 'Full Thrust Fan Creations Wiki' or similar 
(I've had a look, but the only Wiki I found was the FT FAQ, last 
updated in 2009 IIRC).

-- 
Charles Taylor