RE: SFB-type shields in FT
From: Douglas Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 12:46:45 +0000
Subject: RE: SFB-type shields in FT
I'm not for something this complex being 'the rule' in FT; I love
fiddling, and this is just that. Actually, there are parts of FT I'm for
simplifying.
Wish you had said most anything other than SS; I've been so disappointed
with all Ad Astra games, and demos at cons, up til now, hard to imagine
me trying another. Fool me once, shame on me, fool me five times, what
is wrong with this picture?
It really has become a personal thing with Ken Burnside.
Doug
-----Original Message-----
From: Hugh Fisher [mailto:laranzu@ozemail.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2014 2:28 AM
To: gzg@firedrake.org
Subject: Re: SFB-type shields in FT
>textfilter: chose text/plain from a multipart/alternative
>
>Anyone following this thread? Still getting my head around it, but for
>ST-themed play, without the whole energy allocation snarl, I like it so
>far.
Trying to follow along. Much as I like Full Thrust, I'm still rather
bemused as to why go to so much trouble modifying the game when, say,
Squadron Strike is much more flexible.
cheers,
Hugh Fisher