Prev: RE: [FT] Yet another question about fighters... Next: RE: [FT] Yet another question about fighters...

RE: [FT] Yet another question about fighters...

From: Samuel Penn <sam@g...>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:00:40 +0100
Subject: RE: [FT] Yet another question about fighters...

 On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:36:09 +0100, Ground Zero Games <jon@gzg.com> 
 wrote:
> The use of the term "free shot" is, in hindsight, a little misleading
> - what I was attempting to convey was not an ADDITIONAL attack, but a
> volley of shots without risk of return fire - if one player moves
> into dogfight contact with an enemy group (or if resolving an ongoing
> dogfight from a previous turn), and that enemy decides not to hang
> around and engage in the dogfight then the attacking group gets to
> fire at them anyway as they disengage - with the disengaging group
> NOT being able to shoot back (they are pointing the wrong way and
> pouring on the thrust!).

 And if you're in a Starfury, pointing the right way and pouring on
 the thrust?

-- 
 Be seeing you,
 Sam.

Prev: RE: [FT] Yet another question about fighters... Next: RE: [FT] Yet another question about fighters...