Re: More future history questions
From: <Beth.Fulton@c...>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:21:18 +1100
Subject: Re: More future history questions
G'day,
Thanks for the responses.
I would have to agree that I found the book constraining and very
one-eyed, ignoring whole ranges of alternatives. On the hobby front I
enjoyed the Years of Rice and Salt much more (and it was openly sold as
science fiction).
I've had to read a whole heap of futurist journals and stuff of late and
all I can say is that any of you could probably do a better job than the
majority of the guys who do it for a living (especially as they never
seem to go back and check where they went wrong) - so if you're ever in
need of a book deal idea just relabel yourself as a strategic
adviser....
Thanks
Beth